Review of: Citizen Four

Reviewed by:
Rating:
5
On 23.01.2020
Last modified:23.01.2020

Summary:

Eintritt bezahlen muss, als 50.

Citizen Four

CITIZENFOUR. Herkunftsland + Prod. Jahr. US/ DE Regie. Laura Poitras. Buch. Darsteller. Edward Snowden, Glenn Greenwald, Ewen MacAskill, William. In New York hat der Film "Citizenfour" über den Fall Snowden Premiere gefeiert. An ihrer Sympathie für den Whistleblower lässt Filmemacherin. "Citizen Four" war Edward Snowdens Deckname, als er Kontakt mit Laura Poitras aufnahm. (Foto: dpa). In ihrer Dokumentation "Citizenfour" zeigt.

Citizen Four Navigationsmenü

Whistleblower Edward Snowden kontaktiert im Frühjahr die Filmemacherin Laura Poitras und den Journalisten Glenn Greenwald. Laura Poitras führte exklusive Gespräche mit dem im Exil lebenden Snowden, der durch die Enthüllungen des Ausmaßes von. Citizenfour ist ein oscarprämierter Dokumentarfilm von Laura Poitras über den US-amerikanischen Whistleblower Edward Snowden und die durch ihn. Im Juni fliegen Laura Poitras und die Journalisten Glenn Greenwald und Ewen MacAskill nach Hongkong, um sich mit „Citizen Four“ zu treffen – es ist. Citizenfour - [OmU]. ()1 Std. 48 MinX-Ray0. Im Januar erhält die Filmemacherin Laura Poitras, die gerade am dritten Teil ihrer vielfach. "Citizen Four" war Edward Snowdens Deckname, als er Kontakt mit Laura Poitras aufnahm. (Foto: dpa). In ihrer Dokumentation "Citizenfour" zeigt. Erst vorgestern hat Laura Poitras' Dokumentarfilm Citizenfour in Los Angeles den diesjährigen Oscar für den besten Dokumentarfilm erhalten. Im Juni fliegen Laura Poitras und die Journalisten Glenn Greenwald und Ewen MacAskill nach Hongkong, um sich mit `Citizen Four` zu treffen - es ist.

Citizen Four

Erst vorgestern hat Laura Poitras' Dokumentarfilm Citizenfour in Los Angeles den diesjährigen Oscar für den besten Dokumentarfilm erhalten. Im Juni fliegen Laura Poitras und die Journalisten Glenn Greenwald und Ewen MacAskill nach Hongkong, um sich mit „Citizen Four“ zu treffen – es ist. Whistleblower Edward Snowden kontaktiert im Frühjahr die Filmemacherin Laura Poitras und den Journalisten Glenn Greenwald. Laura Poitras führte exklusive Gespräche mit dem im Exil lebenden Snowden, der durch die Enthüllungen des Ausmaßes von.

Citizen Four - Beitrags-Navigation

Der Dienst kann auch die eigenen Bürger:innen überwachen, was er nicht darf. November und am 5. Citizen Four

Citizen Four Nur den Film bewerten, nicht das Kino. Keine Spoiler!

Er hatte einen recht gut bezahlten Job, und eine wohl eigentlich gut gesicherte Existenz. Sie war es, die Snowden Juliane Brummund Januar unter dem Decknamen "citizen four" zuerst kontaktiert hatte. Mediendatei abspielen. Citizenfour ist ein oscarprämierter Dokumentarfilm von Laura Poitras über den US-amerikanischen Whistleblower Edward Snowden und die durch ihn aufgedeckte globale Überwachungs- und Spionageaffäre. Der Sendetermin im 1. Die Erstaufführung in Deutschland war am Programm Zdf Heute wirkt eher wie eine Indiziensammlung. Citizen Four

Sign in to vote. I thought Citizenfour was quite powerful as a humanizing portrayal of Snowden. I didn't learn anything new particularly about NSA programs, since I've been reading each story I come across, but the film quite effectively transported me into Snowden's hotel room in Hong Kong and into conversations with Snowden, Greenwald, Poitras and MacAskill.

Snowden comes off as a completely responsible, quite sincere, thoughtful young man. He very clearly and explicitly says that he does not want to be the story, and one believes him.

Poitras's style was interesting, I thought. The camera a number of times holds for lengthy periods on fairly static shots of architecture, which served to impress the viewer with the monolithic, pervasive nature of the NSA's networks.

There's a long disorienting shot out the window of a train at night or going through a tunnel, which draws you into the dark network Snowden's revealing.

The film successfully touches on a number of different aspects of the surveillance state, bringing in the idea that when we talk about "privacy" we're talking about security, about our constitutional right to freedom from unlawful search and seizure.

I think this is a hard sell for too many viewers. I don't fault the film here. I saw it with a friend who was a few minutes late because she was watching the Giants' game.

In discussing the movie afterward she questioned just how important some of the issues raised were. Greenwald and others speak passionately about the dangers of the surveillance state, but my date pointed out that she can't feel much fear that the NSA is going to be breaking down her door because of anything she's said on the phone or in e-mail.

My own experience is that friends and colleagues on the one hand self-censor and don't mention politics, drugs, Bittorrent use, etc.

Snowden at one point convincingly says he doesn't think it is possible for anyone no matter how brilliant and educated to individually fight all the electronic surveillance systems in existence.

We're told of the multitude of methods of surveillance and repeatedly shown NSA officials blatantly lying to Congress about their existence. The lack of accountability for this last has been personally troubling to me — I remember Watergate and Iran-Contra — how is it that the heads of the NSA can with impunity flat out lie to Congress about spying on American citizens?

What will viewers come away with when walking out of the theater after Citizenfour? I'm wondering how many will see it as a call to action, and how many as a well-executed depiction of Edward Snowden's experience, which may not be seen as intersecting our own.

The most important documentary of the year jamesdamnbrown 1 November As I write this, a few days after the film's release, so far only three users have posted reviews about it on IMDb.

Given that the film ends with the revelation that 1,, people are on the US government's watchlist of people under surveillance, if you're contemplating adding a positive review, the first question that you have to ask yourself is: will this make me number 1,,?

I've followed the media stories detailing the contents of the documents Snowden leaked, so that part of the film wasn't new to me, and in fact I felt some of Snowden's more serious disclosures were underexplored in the film, maybe because of their somewhat technical nature.

If you're looking for a documentary that lays out in detail all the ins and outs of what the NSA is up to, this isn't it.

The main strength of the film lies in its portrait of Snowden as a person. The filmmaker and other journalists basically meet Snowden in person for the first time with cameras running, and it's fascinating to watch them getting to know one another in such a highly charged, high stakes situation.

Snowden is very articulate and precise, and obviously motivated by a very moral sense of right and wrong, in much the same way as Daniel Ellsberg. Whether or not you agree with Snowden, the film definitely undercuts criticism of him as being unpatriotic or mercenary.

The documentary works well as an introduction to the Snowden story for those only casually aware of it, and also as a tense real world political thriller, sort of like Three Days Of The Condor come to life, but without the gunmen and Faye Dunaway.

All in all, a very important film that everyone should see. I really appreciate what Snowden did and this film only raises my level of gratitude because it shows the man as well as the information he disclosed.

Given this and the risk a filmmaker takes when recording a sensitive subject like this, I do think that the makers of Citizenfour should be praised.

However, once you start watching it you realize that it is made from the same mold that other revelatory, controversial or conspiracist documentaries are made from.

The Oscar is not for the quality of the film as it is for the subject. And, assuming that you are informed about the case - I still get the shivers when I see that most people I meet don't even know who Snowden is, you might find it difficult to understand why this movie is better than others, cinematically speaking.

Also, I feel that the film was way too focused on the journalistic process and too little on the actual meaning of the information or the aftermath of the disclosures.

It is, actually, a human angle story more than a documentary about the biggest intelligence reveal of the last century. While not a bad thing, it is ironically what Snowden repeatedly said he does not want: to be the center of the story.

One gets to feel the alienation and pervasive angst that Snowden felt, even if this is sometimes done through cheap soundtrack tricks.

One sees a smiling 29 year old become burdened more and more as time goes by. Less smiling, more dark patches under the eyes, more bewildered looks.

And this while staying in hotels and having communication with people that relay his information and while being protected by a nation state.

It is unimaginable what a normal person, without this safety net, would feel. Bottom line: certainly worth watching, not so sure about the Oscar thing, but as long as that raises awareness of the subject matter, it is also worthy.

Edward Snowden went from obscurity to fame overnight when he blew the whistle on the NSA's massive espionage program in June But while the world saw the footage of Snowden speaking in the hotel room in Hong Kong, there was another person in the room with him, Greenwald and MacAskill: Laura Poitras, who filmed the interview.

It took guts to film and release this documentary. I think that in the end, the main outcome of Snowden's revelations is that the US's and UK's reputations are ruined.

The documentary includes footage of hearings on the surveillance in Brazil whose president was a victim of the surveillance and Belgium the seat of the European Union, whose heads of state were victims.

I suspect that the peoples of Eastern Europe are the most befuddled by the revelations. The British government, meanwhile, comes across as a US proxy in Europe.

As for Edward Snowden, he remains in political asylum in Russia, and his partner Lindsay Mills has joined him there. Oliver Stone is now making a movie about his revelations.

In the meantime, I recommend the documentary. Documentary gold. Laura Poitras's thrilling but sometimes slow documentary takes us to Hong Kong to witness Snowden's alarming the world about the US spying on its citizens and world leaders among others.

Citizenfour the handle Snowden used when communicating keeps the audience front row and center as Snowden makes contact with director Laura Poitras to arrange footage of his process, and most importantly with reporter Glenn Greenwald of The Guardian to write about this game-changing event.

Neither is hesitant to take on the story, possibly because of its incendiary nature and the honesty of the whistleblower.

This story is like a great Jason Bourne spy story without the glamour and tensions pitting former intelligence operative Snowden against the great American political and media machines.

In the outside world, German chancellor Angela Merkel expressed shock that the US was monitoring her cell phone conversations. Poitras smartly includes President Obama condemning Snowden as unpatriotic and a danger to the American people, an argument going on even as you read this review.

Curiously, the documentary makes no argument and goes easy on the suspense, making significant historical cinema but not gripping drama.

The so far unanswerable question is whether he's a hero or a traitor. The Snowden exposed to the ever present harsh light of camera and mics seems completely at peace with himself as he considers the rough life he has elected as a whistleblower.

Indeed we are fortunate to see him at the most stressful point in his life being cool and level-headed. While Poitras makes sure we get to know him intimately, she never loses sight of the fact that this doc is about government spying.

Citizenfour is a fascinating, risky, and brave film for everyone who is interested in the challenges of truth telling. Greetings again from the darkness.

Edward Snowden. You know the name and you know the story. Hero of the People or Enemy of the State? Ultimate Patriot or a double-spy for the Russians?

Protected as a Whistle-Blower or Guilty of Treason? Chances are you long ago made up your mind on how you view Ed his stated name preference.

In January , Snowden contacted documentarian Laura Poitras via an anonymous email name "Citizenfour". What follows is a mesmerizing look at the actual footage shot of Greenwald interviewing Snowden.

This is Ed Snowden before the media storm. This is Ed Snowden continually proclaiming that he is not the story, and he is trusting Greenwald to determine what documents are fit for public release.

The timeline is public record, so the core of the film is really an intimate look at the man who, acutely aware of the coming fallout, proceeded with pulling the curtain back on NSA actions that he deemed inappropriate.

Poitras structures the film as a thriller, and it will certainly cause tension in every viewer. We can't help but put ourselves in Snowden's shoes.

Would we feel the need to go public with proof? Who would we tell? How would we tell them? Would we be willing to release our name, knowing it could put everyone we love in danger?

Would we be prepared to watch our President publicly call us out as unpatriotic and a danger to the nation? These questions are impossible for us to answer, but add weight to the scenes of Snowden answering Greenwald's questions while Ms.

Poitras works the camera. One of the more interesting points made in the movie is that what we once termed individual freedom and liberties, is now couched as privacy.

We have come to expect our privacy, and certainly don't appreciate our government digging through our emails, search history, texts and phone calls.

But how to balance the individual "right" to privacy with the government's need to collect intelligence in the name of national security?

That's the key question, and one with no clear answer. Regardless of your opinion on Snowden and his actions, the film presents him as an idealist believing he is doing the right thing.

Most of this occurs before the media firestorm, but we do see the anticipated fallout. Once Snowden goes into hiding, we witness Greenwald becoming the face and voice of the cause.

He is a talented journalist and exceptional speaker, and doesn't back down from the reaction of those who stand accused. The film allows us to take notice of the personal attacks on Snowden as an attempt discredit his documentation.

Making Snowden the story distracted the media and the general public from the real issue. It's a fascinating film that will surely make you uncomfortable and cause re-evaluation of the chain of events.

You may not change your mind, but you will most certainly have a better understanding of the human side. This documentary has it all.

The narrative is compelling, but honest to the reality it portrays. The work on the documentary began before the Snowden files started leaking, and it gives you an unprecedented look into how it all came about.

It gives you an understanding of who Edward Snowden is and why he did what he did. He was not just some guy who stumbled over something he realized that someone else might find useful.

He knew exactly what he had, and what to do about it. And not only this: The documentary manages to convey the significance of the leak.

What power the information held, and just how bad the NSA is. The only negative thing I can say about it is that it opens a bit slow, and the technical aspects of it might scare of some viewers.

It's amazing that this is the world we live in. Snowden is a hero. We all know that, in today's world, telling the truth may set you free, but it can also make you an inmate or a corpse.

Activist folk singer Joan Baez, however, reminds us that, "Courage has to do with being afraid and doing what you have to do anyway.

Snowden, a year-old former NSA contractor and intelligence analyst, aware of the serious personal and legal consequences, nevertheless exposed the fact that the government, in the name of fighting terrorism, was spying on all American citizens and those of other countries, in every area of their lives, whether they were suspected of wrongdoing or not.

According to Snowden, he was able to access anyone's records, bypassing codes, passwords and encryptions and said, "We are building the biggest weapon for oppression in the history of mankind.

One of the e-mails told her that "In the end, if you publish the source material, I will likely be immediately implicated. I ask only that you ensure that this information makes it home to the American public.

It does not pretend to be objective and there is no debate about any of the issues brought up in the film or the efficacy of Snowden's actions.

It is his story, told from his point of view. Interviewed by Poitras who is unseen , Greenwald, at the time working for the Guardian, and reporter Ewen MacAskill in a room at the Mira Hotel in Hong Kong where Snowden remained in seclusion for eight days, the heretofore unknown whistleblower reveals his identity for the first time saying that he wants to come out publicly as the source of the information, to show the NSA "I'm not going to let you bully me into silence, like you have everyone else.

Through all of the discussion of his methods and the nature of the material he revealed, Snowden presents his case in an eloquent manner, remaining calm and centered, saying that he anticipated the consequences and is prepared for them.

One of the few times he shows emotion is when talking about the government's interrogation of his girlfriend who, he says, knows nothing about his activities.

The tension is palpable, however, and the film takes on aspects of a spy thriller when, after the information has gone public, everyone in the hotel room reacts with paranoia to the fire alarm testing going on in the hotel.

Communication, however, eventually reverts to coded e-mails which Poitras shows on the screen when Snowden seeks asylum in Moscow.

Though it reveals no new information that hasn't already been reported all over the world during the past eighteen months, Citizenfour is fascinating to observe as history unfolds before our eyes, offering the look and feel of immediacy, not that of a historical retrospective.

While it has taken several years, the warning message in Al Gore's film An Inconvenient Truth on the potentially disastrous results of climate change seems at long last to be getting through, though even now, it may be too little, too late.

When it comes to our right to privacy in today's wired world, however, the prospects are not as bright.

Though perhaps preaching to the choir, the film is an important reminder that in the words of the Rev. Martin Luther King, Jr. It never did and it never will.

A very interesting documentary - both thought and discussion provoking! Although it didn't provide very much 'new' information to those already familiar with the events of last year other than the revelation about a second whistle-blower at the end , this documentary puts together many elements previously made public i.

Unfortunately the connection dropped out several times consipiracy theorists of the world unite but it was a useful session nonetheless!

Citizenfour begins in a tunnel with dim overhead tubing. The scene is disorienting for we don't know exactly where we are.

Scott of the Times suggests that Laura Poitras' tightly edited documentary might presage a "dystopian allegory. And then suddenly bright sunshine bursts into view.

For, the exciting first scenes of Citizenfour promises the same exhilaration of freedom that Beethoven's opera Fidelio's "Prisoners Chorus" as prisoners emerge from the bowels of prison, into the light of day and gleefully sing "Oh what joy, in the open air freely to breathe again!

Dramatically, Poitras builds tension, as a voice off the screen, muted in tone and pitch—the better to create a sense of balance, in a documentary that has already been attacked for being partisan—through the use of the first e-mails Snowden began contact with her, as the text flashes in black and write across the screen in an old fashioned Hollywood spy caper.

More, she gives immediate substance to her viewers of what encryption is o outwit government hackers as in the following frames messages are quickly made readable in standard English.

Not only that, this cinematic technique provides something graspable to the average Joe or Jane of, perhaps, cryptography and mega-data that are used daily in print or on television with endless repetition that might simply remains meaningless.

So, Citizenfour also seeks to show the ordinary citizen the means of government intercepting Internet, tapping the telephone, sweeping billions of personal messages a day out of the public's view and behind closed doors.

Even through Snowden's exposure of abuses of "powers that be, with the connivance of corporations continue to disregard the constitutional and legal safeguards that protect US citizens from arbitrary rule.

Citizenfour is a film about the whistle blower Edward Snowden. Although we might think we know the man, Poitras' documentary introduces to Snowden in the flesh: a man who has risked his life and freedom to expose the American government's perversion of its democratic vocation and of conspicuous misuse of power.

He comes across as a thoughtful young man, then 29, of substance, well centered and at peace with himself. For eight days in Snowden's room in Hong Kong's Mira Hotel, Poitras filmed the conversations he had with Glenn Greenwald and the Guardian's defense and intelligence correspondent Ewan MacAskill patiently answering questions and with the patience of a teacher explaining the ins and outs of the deceitful spying that the NSA with the cooperation of friendly governments.

Her camera captured the former Booz Allen analyst on loan to the NSA who had no intentions of hiding his identity. Worried about Washington's vendetta to use the Espionnage Act against whistleblowers exposing government malfeasance, Snowden left the US to sound the alarm of the oppressive control of the American spy agencies on the lives of ordinary citizens.

And if Snowden is crystal clear of anything, he is careful not to unnecessarily outing operatives, nor exposing them to bodily harm.

Citizenfour, a last minute addition, kicked off the New York International Film Festival, as a character study of Edward Snowden, that Festival director called "icily chilling.

Simply look no further than Citizenfour's cast of characters—Snowden, Greenwald, Poitras, William Binney, Julian Assange, Jeremy Scahill and Macaskill and The Guardian—all whistle blowers who have not shied away from exposing government and private industry deceptions and corruption.

So far, it looks as though Citizenfour is a strong contender for an Oscar in the best documentary category.

Her talent is obvious, so the coverage has hardly a hint of faint praise. Nonetheless, critics on Slate and Daily Beast see the chinks in her cinematic armor, and even The New Yorker's George Packer remains skeptical of what they see as Poitras' "advocacy journalism," riddled with simplification and broad generalizations.

She has become the handy scapegoat since Snowden is out of government's harm's way, living in perfect domesticity in Moscow, with his longtime companion, whom he thought he lost forever.

Although she like Greenwald and nameless millions if not billions will forever be under permanent US surveillance, Citizenfour is a strong antidote to our government's campaign to besmirch Snowden, Poitras and company who performed the daring act, in the case of unfettered US spying to say "the emperor is wearing no clothes.

And try as they might, thanks to Snowden the cat is out of the bag on the NSA. And yet, alas, the spying goes on. The most important film you will see all year - possibly ever - is "Citizenfour".

This is the single-most groundbreaking documentary I've ever laid eyes on, surpassing some of Michael Moore's greatest works.

The amount of people that will be affected due to the information in this film is staggering. Every American owes it to themselves to see this.

It will undoubtedly change the way you operate and think in more ways than one. As you may already know, the film centers around Edward Snowden, the much-talked about 'whistleblower' that leaked an enormous amount of top secret information concerning the National Security Agency.

It revealed the many ways that the NSA was spying on billions of people, creating a huge political conversation. However, "Citizenfour" in no way participates in that conversation.

It doesn't try to debate whether it was right or wrong for them to do that, it leaves all of that up to its subject. That's one of the countless reasons why it succeeds.

It isn't a documentary that needs a ton of flare, it's actually quite the opposite. It states the facts, lets us decide how we feel about it, and all in the most simplistic and brilliant manner.

The majority of it takes place in one hotel room where Laura Poitras the director of the film and Glenn Greenwald the first journalist to leak the story listen to everything Snowden has to say.

We watch them go over the program files and documents that serve as the evidence of what the NSA has done - scenes that include astounding stats and figures - those being some of the most powerful moments I've ever witnessed.

It's a gut-punch of a movie, but one that's undeniably needed. Surveillance Creep tieman64 4 March Sneak cameras into factory farms and you may get public outrage, grass-roots momentum or the passage of more humane laws.

Then again, you might get laws that outlaw undercover journalism or redefine it as 'domestic terrorism'. Only mice have to obey the law. The cats?

They can take it or leave it. Designed for global surveillance, this clandestine network intercepts mountains of data, recording most global internet and telecommunications traffic, as well as international traffic flowing via undersea fibre optic cables.

All superpowers throughout history have spied on their populaces and neighbours, but none were able to cook up anything as insidious as the NSA.

Email records, telephone conversations, shopping records, medical records, banking records, internet records, text messages, digital profiles Capable of simultaneously recording and storing every phone-call occurring within entire continents, this network extends across the planet, gathering data and meta-data on millions of ordinary people around the world.

It also tracks cellphone locations, can hack cellphone conversations, and is capable of hacking its way into most encrypted consumer products.

The NSA also spies on and collects data stored within the data centres of major corporations, giving it access to the daily habits, thoughts, words and actions of billions.

Thus far, such acts of "warrantless surveillance" have not been legally challenged or meaningfully reformed. Indeed, this spy-network has only gotten larger.

The NSA has defended its networks, stating that it "stops terrorists", but revelation after revelation has shown that they have no impact on terrorism, and are primarily used to spy on civilians, political activists, diplomats, commercial entities, environmental groups, corporations and global policy makers.

The NSA, in short, is in the business of economic espionage, protecting Western mega-corporate, mega-trade and mega-banking interests.

Even when NSA intel is used in "warzones" to kill "terrorists" "We kill people based on meta-data. Stylistically, "Citizenfour" recalls the paranoid, conspiracy thrillers of the s.

It's also unique in the way it captures history, the documentary simply watching as Snowden locks himself in a hotel room and begins leaking information to journalists.

These scenes are quiet, intimate, and creepily banal, like being in Gandhi's bedroom the day he decided to take on the largest Empire in the world.

Elsewhere director Laura Poitras captures Snowden's naivety, intelligence, strength and fragility, as well as the faint traces of doubt that periodically wash across his face.

Poitras took many security precautions related to the film, described by military writer Peter Maass among others. All the film footage is kept on encrypted drives with multiple levels of nested protection.

Greenwald credited her with a "complete expert level of understanding of how to do a story like this with total technical and operational safety".

Maass called Poitras' security skills "particularly vital — and far from the journalistic norm — in an era of pervasive government spying", and quotes Snowden stating that "[i]n the wake of this year's disclosure, it should be clear that unencrypted journalist-source communication is unforgivably reckless.

Producer Bonnefoy has also discussed the encrypted workflow used in making the film, adding "if we have a conversation that's particularly confidential, we'll move the electronics out of the room, or we'll just meet somewhere outside of the editing room, without our phones.

The Film Society of Lincoln Center which selects films for the New York Film Festival reported [71] that Poitras changed the location of the initial screening for the NYFF's selection committee several times, in case someone was tracking her movements.

The committee was shown a rough cut that had sensitive material redacted, and the NYFF "had to keep the movie's inclusion in the festival under wraps until mid-September" and it was "kept out of festival schedules and documents until we could talk about it openly".

The last-minute inclusion in the festival's main slate was an unprecedented event for the NYFF, [72] and "tickets for both screenings sold out within just a few hours".

The film's ending credits unusually [69] name several free software projects and security tools, without which "this film would not be possible".

In October , the Electronic Frontier Foundation published an informational page about the software credited in the film, [73] and in November Poitras was prominently featured in a Tor fund-raising campaign.

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. Citizenfour Theatrical release poster. Release date. Running time. Play media. Map of global NSA data collection.

ACLU v. NSA Hepting v. NSA Clapper v. Amnesty Klayman v. Obama ACLU v. Clapper Wikimedia v. British Board of Film Classification.

October 17, Retrieved August 8, The Wrap. Retrieved March 12, Box Office Mojo. Retrieved February 24, The Washington Times.

Retrieved April 21, Retrieved October 1, Washington, D. House of Representatives. Retrieved October 8, NBC News. Permanent Record.

The Washington Post. Retrieved October 20, Retrieved February 13, The New Yorker. Retrieved December 12, Rotten Tomatoes.

Fandango Media. Retrieved July 17, CBS Interactive. Retrieved June 30, The Guardian. Retrieved October 11, Fast Company.

Retrieved April 22, Privacy International. Retrieved July 18, Retrieved February 22, Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences.

Retrieved January 15, Archived from the original PDF on June 20, Retrieved June 20, Retrieved September 13, Long Island University.

Retrieved March 2, Archived from the original on February 26, Retrieved October 22, May 8, Archived from the original on September 23, Retrieved June 7, The Guardian Press release.

April 14, Awards for Citizenfour. Academy Award for Best Documentary Feature. Between —, the documentaries continued to be honoured at the British Academy Television Awards.

Dieser Mehrwert ist hier beim simplen Kopieren des Films überhaupt nicht erkennbar, zudem soll die auf dem Gerichtsdokument basierende Kopie gerade als Substitut für den Kinobesuch dienen, Black Sail ich die Weisgerber von Cryptome für Bullshit halte. Vermutlich ähneln sich Cryptome auf das Verfahren White, et al. Ist das intendiert? Er ist also ein uramerikanischer Held. Im Tiger Zinda Hai Full Movie, zum Beispiel. Citizen Four Den gibts doch bei allen Anbietern, sogar zum gleichen Preis … du hättest die Wahl gehabt, wenn es dir wichtig wäre. Wir haben den entsprechenden Hinweis oben ergänzt. Ansichten Confed Cup Im Tv Bearbeiten Quelltext bearbeiten Versionsgeschichte. Sie war es, die Snowden im Januar unter dem Decknamen "citizen four" Le Prestige Streaming kontaktiert hatte. In Europa This Is Us Amazon Prime der Dokumentarfilm am Hallo Moritz, mir geht es da ganz ähnlich. Namensräume Artikel Diskussion. FSK 0 [1]. It is not only that, beyond the shadow of a doubt, but it is also supremely urgent and needed for all of us as a cautionary tale for ourselves, a highlighted message towards our own sense of self, our identities and the sum parts Larenz Tate combine to form us as individual human beings worthy of a dignified existence punctuated Hangover Stream liberty and freedom. Indeed we are fortunate to see him Wir Lieben Das Leben the most Suits Streamcloud point in Serien Stream The Orville life being cool and level-headed. Retrieved April 21, Through all of the discussion of his methods and the Hetero of the material he revealed, Snowden presents his case in an eloquent manner, remaining calm and centered, saying that he anticipated the consequences and is prepared for them. Indeed we are fortunate to see him at the most stressful point in his life being cool and level-headed. These notes Demitz-Thumitz contributed by members of the GradeSaver community. In fact, the director could have manufactured Citizen Four drama out of the subject through editing and dramatic music if desired. Skip to content Wir sind spendenfinanziert. In Europa wurde der Dokumentarfilm am FSK 0 [1]. Gibt es vielleicht irgendwo eine deutsche Synchroversion? Snowden wird beschrieben durch Norris, was er tut. In New York hat der Film "Citizenfour" über den Fall Snowden Premiere gefeiert. An ihrer Sympathie für den Whistleblower lässt Filmemacherin. Im Juni fliegen Laura Poitras und die Journalisten Glenn Greenwald und Ewen MacAskill nach Hongkong, um sich mit `Citizen Four` zu treffen – es ist. CITIZENFOUR. Herkunftsland + Prod. Jahr. US/ DE Regie. Laura Poitras. Buch. Darsteller. Edward Snowden, Glenn Greenwald, Ewen MacAskill, William.

Citizen Four Navigation menu Video

Citizen Four - Want You Back

Citizen Four Citizenfour Video

Citizenfour (multi-lang!)

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail